Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Risk on Security of Electronic Health Information

Coursework No. 5

You are part of a group practice that has decided to implement an electronic solution for clinical documentation. However, you have come across many horror stories regarding health information security that have led to failed clinical information system implementations. How would you prevent this from happening to your group practice?

Create an article listing down questions that your group practice should be able to answer to identify risks to securing electronic health information. Post this in your blog and post the links to that article at the UP MSHI facebook group as well as here in uvle.



Identified Risk
Security and Confidentiality Policy Principles
Are there existing policies in the organization for security and confidentiality of health information?
Organizational Policies and Procedures
What are the standard operating procedure of the organization in gathering, storing and using health information?
Storage of confidential data
How do the organization plan in storing the confidential data?
Use of Data
How do the organization plan in using the data? In psuedo anonymized form or individual patient information?
Dissemanation of Information
Is there a written policy on which data elements can only be dissemenated?
Disposal of Information
For old records are to be disposed, what is the standard operating procedure on destroying the information?


Bibliography

Hutton, T. (2012). Protecting the Confidentiality and Security of Patient Information. Asia eHealth Information Network (pp. 55-58). Bangkok, Thailand: WHO.



Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Barriers and risks of an EMR Implementation

In the research article by Boonstra and Broekuis, Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. The writers mentioned,  32 barriers under 7 categories.  Amongst the mentioned barriers, as a Project Manager, there are risks that as a part of a team, can already be managed with good planning.

A.     Financial (4)
a.     High start-up costs
b.     High ongoing costs
c.      Uncertainty over ROI
d.     Lack of financial resources
B.     Technical (8)
a.     Physician and/or staff lack computer skills
b.     Lack of technical training and support
c.      Complexity of the System
d.     Limitations of the system
e.     Lack of customizability
f.      Lack of reliability
g.     Interconnectivity/Standardization
h.     Lack of computers/hardware
C.     Time (5)
a.     Time required to select, purchase and implement the system
b.     Time to learn the system
c.      Time required to enter data
d.     More time per patient
e.     Time to convert patient records
D.    Psyschological (2)
a.     Lack of belief in EMR
b.     Need for control
E.     Social (5)
a.     Uncertainty about the vendor
b.     Lack of support from external parties *
c.      Interference with doctor-patient relationship *
d.     Lack of support from other colleagues
e.     Lack of support from the management level
F.     Legal (1)
a.     Privacy or security concerns
G.     Organizational (5)
a.     Organizational size
b.     Organizational type
c.      Lack of support from the organizational culture
d.     Lack of incentives
e.     Lack of participation


But there are risks/barriers that can be managed when you just (if) you encountered like
·      lack of support in external parties,
·      interference with doctor-patient relationship
·      lack of support from the organizational culture and need for control

The lack of support of external parties is not easy to manage especially if the impact of the change will disrupt their standard operations. The buy-in factor that we or the organization perceive is to far off from the vision of the organization they represent. For example if DOH chose to implement an ICT system to give solution to a need, stakeholders might not support the system like insurance companies.  As they may take it as an additional  and inessential expense.  These group of peole are  usually not part of the project management team, since they are not represented in the planning their concerns are not voiced.

According to Lakbala et. al., the lack of support from external parties a factor that influences decisions by physicians on EMR adoption. Furthermore, insurance companies, which work closely with medical practices, lack specific actions and policies to support the use of EMRs.  (P. Lakbala)

Another barrier is interference with doctor-patient relationship.  Though this barrier is manageable through reminders and through the capacity building exercises. It is easier said than done. When the system is already up and running, the doctor might get overwhelmed during the consultations.  The health workers will certainly need time to adjust to the new system.  Going live with a new system will need adjustment specially to the end users.

According to an article “Bringing the HER into the Physician-Patient Relationship”,  middle-physicians have negative thoughts about HER, he posted very valid concerns by the physicians, like “Will technology interfere with the humanism and patient interactions that form the heart and soul — if not the science — of medical care?” and the patients have their insight as well, "I didn't tell the nurse I was suicidal because she never looked at me when she asked the question. I figured she didn't really care." And "I want to see a different specialist. He just kept his head down typing the whole time. He's a computer doctor, not a real doctor." (Sheehan, 2012)

In Dr. Sheehan’s article, he made a list of to-do’s to approach this barrier. And it takes someone who had negative thought on the use of an EMR to change the attitude of health workers who have concern on doctor-patient relationship.

He said, “ Technology is a tool that I utilize for patient care; it does not and should not replace the fundamentals of patient care, or common sense for that matter. A long and impressive looking office note with no "substance" helps no one. If an acute visit, for example, only needs a short note, I will only free text a short note” (Sheehan, 2012)

“ I try to never complain about the EHR to the patient, and also try to explain and show how the use of the EHR can improve patient care. Getting the patient to look at something on the monitor such as the tracking of blood pressures, for example, is an excellent way to do just that.” (Sheehan, 2012)


Lastly, the lack of support from the organizational culture and need for control. I chose to link these two barriers, as I see it the culture with in the organization and their control over the processes are already established among themselves. Even if there is a buy in with the new system, once it is being implemented the change creates stress to the organization and their control of over the processes is changed or removed.

An organizational culture that fosters leadership and support is a critical factor when it comes to technology adoption. For example, Rogers’ authority innovation-decision model shows that leaders use their authority to enforce change. Peter Senge’s concept of leadership in a learning organization also illustrates how leaders are supposed to steward and teach members, thereby driving adoption. Further, in the innovation adoption literature, characteristics of key organizational actors have been found to be critical in influencing the innovative behavior of people within the organization and thereby their willingness to engage in adoption processes (P. Nambisan, 2013)


Bibliography

A. Boonstra, M. B. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions . Health Services Research .
P. Lakbala, M. L. (n.d.). ctors Affecting Electronic Medical Record Acceptance by Specialist Physicians.
Sheehan, W. (2012, July 23). Bringing the EHR into Physician-Patient Relationship. Retrieved February 22, 2016 from Physicians Practice: Your Practice, Your Way: http://www.physicianspractice.com/ehr/bringing-ehr-physician-patient-relationship
P. Nambisan, G. K. (2013, March). Understanding Electronic Medical Record Adoption in the United States: Communication and Sociocultural Perspectives. Interactive Journal of Medical Research .


Thursday, January 28, 2016

Adopting EMRs and CPOE in Japan under a national strategy

The trends in EMR and CPOE adoption in Japan under the national strategy by Yuichi Yoshida, Takeshi Imai and Kazuhiko Ohe

Reading this article made me realize that even for Japan – a highly technological society would have the same issues as the Philippines in adoption of EMR and CPOE.  The efforts of the government covers all the all health facilities, however the efforts prioritized medium to large hospitals over small hospitals and clinics and this greatly affected the adoption rate among these healthcare facilities.

Just like here in the Philippines, their Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) fix medical fee and controls medical institutions via administrative direction on a universal health insurance system.  Computerization of medical billing and CPOE was instroduced in the 1980’s.  However, EMRs was not legally accepted for a long time. Hospitals needed to prepare paper based medical records in accordance to the law even even with the use of EMR. In 1999, MHLW legally permitted the use of EMR.  And in 2001, MHLW published a national policy on the grand design for development of information systems in health care and medical fields. With this, the government set the policy target of increasing the adoption of EMR.   The Diagnostic Procedure Combination (DPC)  fwas introduced in 2003. It is a case-mix payment system.  Along with that submission of computerized medical record data  was required by government to get approved as a DPC hospital. Another factor that affected the adoption is the “The New IT Reform Strategy”, however the targets are medium to large hospitals, but for small medical institutions, the use of low-cost EMR was the goal.

The methodology used was a survey with 30 questions. It has base attributes such as hospital size, location, equipment, clinical specialities and implementation of surgery and tests.  Using this survey, relevant points were studied:  type of establishing organization, number of beds permitted, status of EMR adoption and status of CPOE adoption.

It was found that the rate of adoption is particularly high in medium and large hospital. This can be attributed to Japan’s policy in supporting health IT adoption targeted hospitals with 200 or more beds.  These health facilities were granted a subsidy, financial support. Which results to a relatively high adoption rate.

However, EMR adoption in small hospital remained relative low compared to the overall rate of adoption in hospitals.
Comparing adoption rate of CPOE to EMR, CPOE has higher adoption rate.  However, the government does not approve a subsidy for CPOE adoption only. This has made a condition a combined adoption with EMR and CPOE for financial report.  This was an effective means of raising the rate of EMR adoption.

Another factor why EMR adoption is behind CPOE adoption is that EMR was not legally accepted as official medical record earlier.  Moreover, DPC system implementation affected the adoption of HIS at hospitals.  Low adoption rate in clinics and small hospitals was affected by the government policy of the government focused in hospitals with atleast 200 beds.

Clinics  cited reasons for the low adoption rate. Reasons include, the “workload of doctors would increase”, “cost is high” and “we are used to paper system”.

Another survey was conducted and submitted to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council, the results say that the maintenance cost for health information system adoption per clinic is $20,000 even for facilities with no beds. On estimate clinics and small hospitals receive $440 as subsidy, which is roughly 4% of the maintenance cost of a electronic hospital information system.

However, the national government  of Japan abandoned the idea of complete online medical billing due to the lawsuit against the government by the Japan Medical Association and Japan Dental Association and Japan Pharmaceutical Association to nullify online billing.

 In conclusion, giving financial incentives gave effective means of raising EMR adoption rate. With this study, it was found that IT when used in the health care setting has the potential to improve medical quality and reduce medical costs for society as a whole.


Similary, only efforts lead by the national government can directly affect adoption smarter solutions such as Health Information Technology.  In the Philippines, setting a national standard and strategy in implementing HIT should pick up from knowing the roles of different stakeholders should be prioritized. f The government’s role  should be focused on policy making.  Additionally, incentives are good motivators in adopting fully health information systems.

Reference: The trends in EMR and CPOE adoption in Japan under the national strategy by Yuichi Yoshidaa, Takeshi Imai and Kazuhiko Ohec